Improve wording around CDI integration

Description

We shouldn't focus on portable extensions but describe what functionality regarding Bean Validation a CDI container must provide.

Environment

None

Activity

Show:
Hardy Ferentschik
January 22, 2013, 6:54 PM

Is this still required? The spec already says:

Every Bean Validation provider should provide a CDI Extension (or alternative solution provided it fulfills the requirements) in order to make its implementation available for the containe

That works for me.

Emmanuel Bernard
February 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Edited

Discussion between Pete and me:

Assignee

Emmanuel Bernard

Reporter

Gunnar Morling

Labels

None

Feedback Requested

None

Feedback Requested By

None

backPortable

None

Suitable for new contributors

None

Pull Request

None

backportDecision

None

backportReEvaluate

None

Components

Fix versions

Affects versions

Priority

Minor
Configure