We're updating the issue view to help you get more done. 

Improve details on the spatial feature

Description

While reviewing I stumbled upon a few things that I am not happy with yet:

  • @Spatial on a class without Spatial.name means that the Lucene document field prefix is the fully qualified class name. I don't think that's a correct value

  • SpatialMode.SIMPLE is not descriptive as a name, I'd rather have SpatialModel.RANGE

  • the reference doc is incomplete compared to the feature options we offer

Back to issue 2, is there even a good default value in this case? @ClassBridge has a default value for name but that looks like a mistake as well.

Environment

None

Status

Assignee

Sanne Grinovero

Reporter

Emmanuel Bernard

Labels

None

Suitable for new contributors

None

Pull Request

None

Feedback Requested

None

Components

Fix versions

Affects versions

4.2.0.Beta2

Priority

Major