We're updating the issue view to help you get more done. 

Search 6 groundwork - Improve naming consistency of DSL/builder methods

Description

One sore point, but there may be others, is how we use the "with" prefix:

  • To define the tokenizer or a filter in an analyzer/normalizer, we have a "with" prefix in the ES backend, but not in the Lucene backend

  • To set the container value extractor the programmatic mapping, we have a "with" prefix, but not to set a bridge.

Environment

None

Status

Assignee

Unassigned

Reporter

Yoann Rodière

Labels

None

Suitable for new contributors

None

Pull Request

None

Feedback Requested

None

Fix versions

Priority

Major