Skip to:

  1. Skip to Jira Navigation
  2. Skip to Side Navigation
  3. Skip to Main Content

This issue can't be edited

Because it belongs to an archived project. Jira admins can restore projects from the archive.

Clarify interceptor order in method validation triggering

Description

We need to think about when a parameter validation interceptor ought to be executed in the interceptor stack
Before or after transaction, security? Some interceptors can change param values.
It's likely that transaction and security must go first. What about others?

Gunnar Morling added a comment - 16/Nov/11 8:12 AM
I guess the validation interceptor should be executed as late as possible. I'm just wondering whether this is something which we should define in BV. Wouldn't BV not only provide the API/meta model for method validation, while it's up to integrators how/when to invoke it? In that case we might just add some sort of recommendation related to that aspect to the spec.

Environment

None

Activity

Show:

Emmanuel Bernard August 29, 2012 at 11:01 AM

At most? But we need to decide of the behavior in Java EE, we can't leave it hanging undefined.

Hardy Ferentschik August 29, 2012 at 9:49 AM

I think we should at most add a recommendation.

Emmanuel Bernard August 28, 2012 at 7:00 PM

Decide whether or not non-CDI Java EE managed beans also have interceptors enabled automatically via a non-portable way by the container or are we forcing the user to add the Bean Validation interceptor manually on its beans.
We will try and aligned Java EE managed beans and CDI beans feature wise so so far the logic would be to get a solution transparent to the user like in CDI.

Fixed

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Bug Testcase Reminder (view)

Bug reports should generally be accompanied by a test case!

Bug Testcase Reminder (edit)

Bug reports should generally be accompanied by a test case!

Participants

Emmanuel Bernard
Hardy Ferentschik

Components

Fix versions

Priority

Created August 28, 2012 at 6:31 PM
Updated January 13, 2015 at 8:07 PM
Resolved October 17, 2012 at 1:31 PM