Cannot Reproduce
Details
Assignee
UnassignedUnassignedReporter
Emmanuel BernardEmmanuel BernardComponents
Priority
Minor
Details
Details
Assignee
Unassigned
UnassignedReporter
Emmanuel Bernard
Emmanuel BernardComponents
Priority
Created October 27, 2007 at 5:29 AM
Updated July 1, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Resolved June 30, 2008 at 3:18 PM
Emmanuel,
This is the contents of a message on the Lucene boards regarding cache and filter. I thought you moght be interested in it since you weren't completely happy with your bitset filtering.
--------------------- Check out the HashDocSet from Solr, this is the best way to cache small sets of search results. In general, the Solr BitSet/DocSet classes are more efficient than using the standard java.util.BitSet. You can use these independent of the rest of Solr (though I recommend checking out Solr if you want to do complex caching).
Thom
John Patterson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am thinking about caching search results for common queries and just
> want to check that for small numbers of results it would be better to
> store the doc number as ints or shorts than to store a Filter with a
> BitSet. I guess if you results contain less than 1/32 or 1/16 of the
> number of documents then it would take less memory.
>
> Is there anything else to consider?
>
Hope this helps some.
John G.